Theft Over $5,000

Representation for allegations involving repeated contact, threatening conduct, intimidation, stalking, or fear for personal safety.

Theft Over
$5,000

Theft over $5,000 allegations often involve property whose ownership, value, or movement can be documented in detail. Compass Law represents clients facing these charges in Mississauga and across the GTA, including matters involving vehicles, business assets, inventory, equipment, money, jewellery, or other high-value property. Financial records, access logs, contracts, valuations, workplace permissions, surveillance, communications, possession history, and competing claims of entitlement may all be necessary to determine whether a criminal theft actually occurred.

(647)802-5836

Theft Over $5,000 Defence

Theft, Fraud & Property Offences

Higher-value theft cases often resemble an accounting or ownership dispute before they resemble a criminal trial

Business and workplace allegations can involve several people authorized to move inventory, transfer funds, access equipment, or approve transactions. Understanding internal practices may be essential before one person's actions are characterized as dishonest.

Valuation deserves independent attention because the $5,000 threshold matters. Purchase price, depreciation, condition, market value, invoices, appraisals, and replacement cost can produce very different figures for the same property.

Claims of ownership or entitlement may complicate the allegation. Partnership assets, jointly owned property, borrowed equipment, contractual rights, or disputed payment obligations can create genuine questions about whether the taking was "without colour of right."

Large cases often generate extensive paper trails. The sequence of approvals, transfers, emails, invoices, access records, and accounting entries can provide a more reliable explanation than a simplified allegation made after a loss is discovered.

THE DEFENCE

High-value theft requires a careful audit of ownership, authority, value, and intent.

Establish who owned the property and who had authority to possess, move, transfer, or use it.

Verify value independently where the $5,000 threshold affects the classification of the charge.

Reconstruct transactions and access using records created before the alleged loss was discovered.

Identify contractual, ownership, entitlement, or colour-of-right issues inconsistent with dishonest taking.

Reviews

What Clients Say About
Compass Law

“From the first conversation, Manmeet explained the process clearly and made sure I understood what was happening with my case. Communication was consistent, my questions were answered directly, and I always knew what the next step would be.”

Arjun S.

Compass Law Client

Mississauga, Ontario

★★★★★

“Dealing with a criminal matter was stressful, but Compass Law made the legal process much easier to understand. The advice was practical, straightforward, and never rushed. I appreciated being kept informed throughout the entire matter.”

Priya K.

Compass Law Client

Brampton, Ontario

★★★★★

“Manmeet was professional, responsive, and very clear about my options. He took the time to go through the important details of the case and explain what they meant. I felt prepared for each stage instead of being left guessing.”

Daniel R.

Compass Law Client

Toronto, Ontario

★★★★★

“What stood out most was how easy it was to communicate and get clear answers. Manmeet listened carefully, explained the situation in plain language, and gave me a realistic understanding of what to expect as the case moved forward.”

Navdeep S.

Compass Law Client

Mississauga, Ontario

★★★★★

“Compass Law handled my matter with professionalism from beginning to end. The communication was timely, the advice was easy to understand, and I felt that the important details of my case were being taken seriously throughout the process.”

Michael T.

Compass Law Client

Oakville, Ontario

★★★★★

Common Questions About Theft Over $5,000

The Criminal Code distinguishes theft where the value exceeds $5,000 from theft involving property valued at $5,000 or less.

Yes. Depending on the property, invoices, condition, appraisals, market evidence, depreciation, or other valuation evidence may be relevant.

Yes, but workplace authority, policies, ownership, access, and the accused person's understanding of their entitlement can become important.

No. The prosecution still needs to prove the elements of theft, including the required dishonest taking or conversion and intent.

Discover more

Higher-value theft cases often resemble an accounting or ownership dispute before they resemble a criminal trial

High-value theft requires a careful audit of ownership, authority, value, and intent.

What Clients Say AboutCompass Law

Common Questions About Theft Over $5,000

Theft Over
$5,000

What Clients Say About
Compass Law